Caregivers' Perspectives on the Impact of Cannabidiol (CBD) Treatment for Dravet and Lennox-Gastaut Syndromes: A Multinational Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To increase understanding of the impact of cannabidiol (CBD) on outcomes beyond seizure control among individuals with Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with caregivers of individuals with Dravet syndrome or Lennox-Gastaut syndrome treated with plant-derived, highly purified CBD medicine (Epidiolex in the USA; Epidyolex in Europe; 100 mg/mL oral solution). Symptoms and impacts of Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome on individuals were explored, as were the effects of CBD. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one caregivers of individuals with Dravet syndrome (n = 14) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 7) aged 4-22 years participated. Health-related quality of life improvements associated with CBD included cognitive function, communication, behavior, mobility, and participation in daily activities. Seizure frequency reduction was commonly reported (n = 12), resulting in caregivers having greater freedom and family life being less disrupted. Adverse events were reported by 10 caregivers. CONCLUSION: In addition to reduced seizure frequency, CBD may have a wide range of beneficial effects beyond seizure control that warrant further investigation.

Elicitation of Health State Utilities Associated with Progression from Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Unresponsive Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC).

OBJECTIVES: The treatments for high-grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) vary between bladder preserving intravesical approaches and radical cystectomy. The impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life may vary widely. The purpose of this study was to elicit the general public's perspective on quality of life, measured as utility scores associated with treatment for Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG)-unresponsive NMIBC and disease progression, for supporting economic evaluation of newly developed treatments for NMIBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Part I involved the development and testing of health states describing NMIBC, which was informed by a rapid review, expert input and a patient advisor. Part II involved elicitation of societal utility values for the different health states. Time trade-off (TTO) interviews were conducted with members of the UK general public. Five health states described different NMIBC scenarios including disease recurrence and progression. Participants ranked each health state, followed by the TTO valuation exercise. Descriptors included NMIBC symptom severity, impact and treatment characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 202 members of the general public participated. The mean age was 46 (standard deviation [SD] 14.6) years. Sample mean (SD) EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS) and index scores were 83.2 (12.3) and 0.89 (0.18), respectively. Mean utilities were 0.781 for No High-Grade Recurrence, 0.586 for High-Grade Recurrence, 0.572 for > 1-Year Post-cystectomy and 0.283 for metastatic disease. The First Year Post-cystectomy path health state had a mean utility of 0.288. Pairwise comparisons found statistically significant differences between utilities (p < 0.001), except between High-Grade Recurrence and > 1-Year Post-cystectomy (p = 0.524). There were significant differences in utility scores by age and employment status. CONCLUSION: This study provides utility scores for health states describing living with NMIBC, which is associated with a significant health-related quality-of-life burden. These values address an existing gap in available data and have the potential to be used in models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of both current and newly developed treatments for bladder cancer.

Patient Experiences, Satisfaction, and Expectations with Current Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment: Results of the SLE-UPDATE Survey.

OBJECTIVES: To provide information on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients' experiences, satisfaction, and expectations with treatments and examine the association between treatment satisfaction and patient-reported outcomes (PRO). METHODS: A cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey of US adult patients with SLE was conducted in 2019. The survey consisted of 104 questions about SLE and the following PRO instruments: LupusPRO™, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), an 11-point Worst Pain Numerical Rating scale (NRS), and an 11-point Worst Joint Pain NRS. RESULTS: Five hundred participants (75% female, 76% White/Caucasian, mean age 42.6 ± 12.7 years, 63% with an associate degree or higher) completed the survey. Most participants were "completely" or "somewhat satisfied" with their treatments, although satisfaction rates were lower for corticosteroids (65%), immunosuppressants (71%), and anti-malarials (55%) than for belimumab (intravenous or subcutaneous) (86%) and rituximab (94%). Treatments were more often considered "burdensome" or "very burdensome" for belimumab (67%) and rituximab (63%) than for corticosteroids (48%), immunosuppressants (49%), and anti-malarials (30%). Pain and productivity assessments supported substantial impairment for the majority of participants, even those who indicated that they were completely satisfied with treatments. The treatment goals most commonly reported as "very important" were reducing fatigue, pain, and the frequency or severity of flares. Three-quarters of participants (76.6%) indicated that their physician's goals for their therapy matched their own goals "very" or "somewhat closely." Despite high levels of satisfaction, most participants (63.0%) indicated that their physicians had not asked about their treatment goals during the past 3 months. CONCLUSION: SLE patients reported high rates of satisfaction with current therapies despite identifying substantial treatment burdens, residual pain, and fatigue. Reduced fatigue, pain, and flares were the most important treatment goals for these patients.

A health state utility valuation study to assess the impact of treatment mode of administration in Gaucher disease.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to obtain UK societal-based utility values for health states related to treatment mode of administration using Gaucher disease as the background condition. METHODS: A review of relevant literature and expert clinical input informed the development of five health states characterising the impact of Gaucher disease and its management on patients' lives. A base-state characterising the "controlled disease" was developed as well as four subsequent health states which varied in description of the method (intravenous versus oral) and frequency of treatment administration. Health state utilities were obtained using the time trade-off (TTO) method via face-to-face interviews with 100 members from the UK general population. Before the valuation exercise, participants provided informed consent, completed a demographic form and the EQ-5D, and ranked the health states from best to worst on a 0-100 visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Mean age of the participants (n = 100) was 35 years and 66% were female. Participants reported high EQ-5D VAS (86.1) and index scores (0.95) indicating very good health status. The "controlled disease" state had the highest mean TTO-derived utility value (0.89). There was only a marginal reduction in utility for the generic state for "Oral treatment" (0.85), while the reduction was more pronounced for the generic state for "Intravenous treatment" (0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that the avoidance of the need for intravenous treatment administration is associated with a notable positive increase in health-related quality of life. Patient benefit arising from less invasive treatment could be an important consideration when undertaking economic evaluation of future therapies for Gaucher disease.

Health utilities in relation to treatment response and adverse events in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma and systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

New therapies for relapsing/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) and R/R systemic anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (sALCL) have emerged. This study captured utility values for R/R HL and sALCL to support economic evaluation. Health state "vignettes" were developed describing states associated with R/R HL and sALCL: treatment response (complete or partial response), stable and progressive disease and treatment-related adverse events (B-symptoms, acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease [GVHD] and peripheral neuropathy). Vignettes were evaluated by members of the public in the UK, Australia, Taiwan, Thailand, South Korea, Brazil and Mexico using the time trade-off method. Mean utilities varied substantially. Complete response utility scores were UK: 0.906, Australia: 0.889, Taiwan: 0.597, Thailand: 0.728, South Korea: 0.827, Brazil: 0.764, Mexico: 0.728. Adverse events were associated with disutility: acute GVHD, lowest mean utility value: Thailand 0.124; highest value: Mexico 0.467. Societal evaluation of health states for R/R HL and sALCL revealed a marked perceived benefit of a treatment response.

Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: The EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic measure widely used for the assessment of health status. Research has suggested that it may be insensitive to the burdens associated with particular conditions. This study was designed to explore the feasibility of developing and valuing a disease-specific "bolt-on" version of the EQ-5D questionnaire for use in psoriasis. METHODS: A series of steps were undertaken to develop, test, and evaluate dimensions for a psoriasis-specific version of the EQ-5D questionnaire (hereafter referred to as the EQ-PSO questionnaire). Candidate dimensions were explored through a review of published literature, in-depth qualitative interviews with patients, and consultation with a clinical expert. A psychometric validation exercise was then undertaken to establish how well dimensions functioned. Two dimensions were selected for inclusion in a draft measure alongside the existing EQ-5D questionnaire dimensions: "skin irritation" and "self-confidence." Last, a time trade-off valuation exercise was conducted with 300 members of the UK general public to derive utilities for health states described by the measure. RESULTS: The psychometric analyses indicated that the two new candidate dimensions captured additional variance over and above the existing five dimensions. Data from the valuation exercise were analyzed by using different models. A collapsed random effects model was put forward as a parsimonious and accurate approach. Based on this model, estimated utilities ranged from 0.98 ± 0.02 for state "1111111" to 0.03 ± 0.29 for state "5555555." CONCLUSIONS: This study has developed the EQ-PSO questionnaire to support future psoriasis research and has informed the development of future bolt-on versions of the EQ-5D questionnaire.

Elicitation of health state utilities in soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are uncommon tumours with varying histological subtypes. There is a paucity of available data concerning the quality-of-life (QoL) impact of STS which could be used to support economic evaluation of future treatments. This study aimed to elicit societal utility values for health states that depict the impact of STS and its treatment. METHODS: Following the development of eight health state vignettes, a sample of 100 members of the UK general public participated in a valuation exercise to elicit utility values using the time trade-off procedure. RESULTS: The treatment response state was valued as the least burdensome by participants followed by the prospect of stable disease (mean utility value: 0.736 SD 0.21). Serious adverse events were associated with a range of disutilities from -0.236 for grade III/IV pain to -0.357 for grade III/IV nausea/vomiting. Progressive disease was deemed the least desirable outcome and was associated with a substantial decline in utility (-0.473). CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest advanced STS are associated with significant burden for individuals. Treatment-related adverse events were seen as debilitating, however, progression represents an enormous challenge to QoL. This illustrates the significant value to individuals of extending the progression free survival period.

Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the measurement properties of the 5-level classification system of the EQ-5D (5L), in comparison with the 3-level EQ-5D (3L). METHODS: Participants (n = 3,919) from six countries, including eight patient groups with chronic conditions (cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, depression, diabetes, liver disease, personality disorders, arthritis, and stroke) and a student cohort, completed the 3L and 5L and, for most participants, also dimension-specific rating scales. The 3L and 5L were compared in terms of feasibility (missing values), redistribution properties, ceiling, discriminatory power, convergent validity, and known-groups validity. RESULTS: Missing values were on average 0.8% for 5L and 1.3% for 3L. In total, 2.9% of responses were inconsistent between 5L and 3L. Redistribution from 3L to 5L using EQ dimension-specific rating scales as reference was validated for all 35 3L-5L-level combinations. For 5L, 683 unique health states were observed versus 124 for 3L. The ceiling was reduced from 20.2% (3L) to 16.0% (5L). Absolute discriminatory power (Shannon index) improved considerably with 5L (mean 1.87 for 5L versus 1.24 for 3L), and relative discriminatory power (Shannon Evenness index) improved slightly (mean 0.81 for 5L versus 0.78 for 3L). Convergent validity with WHO-5 was demonstrated and improved slightly with 5L. Known-groups validity was confirmed for both 5L and 3L. CONCLUSIONS: The EQ-5D-5L appears to be a valid extension of the 3-level system which improves upon the measurement properties, reducing the ceiling while improving discriminatory power and establishing convergent and known-groups validity.

Patient preferences for first-line oral treatment for mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis: a discrete-choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) frequently require long-term therapy to prevent relapse. Treatments such as 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA [mesalazine]) are efficacious and well tolerated, but adherence to treatment is often poor. OBJECTIVE: This discrete-choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to estimate differences in patient preferences for 5-ASA treatment in mild-to-moderate UC based on levels of self-reported adherence. Inclusion of patients residing in the US, UK, Germany, and Canada allowed for assessment of possible cultural differences in patient preferences. METHODS: DCE attributes were determined through literature review, clinician consultation, and patient interviews. Six treatment attributes were identified: ease of swallowing, time of day, quantity, extent of flare resolution, likelihood of flare occurrence, and cost. A total of 400 patients in four countries completed the DCE and adherence (Modified Morisky Scale) surveys. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations to estimate patient preference and willingness to pay (WTP) by levels of self-reported adherence and country of residence. RESULTS: All attributes had expected polarity and were significant predictors of patient preference. Self-reported 'good' versus 'poor' adherers significantly preferred symptom control (p = 0.0108) and mucosal healing (p = 0.0190) attributes. All patients stated preference for symptom control/mucosal healing and flare risk attributes; the latter attribute was significantly preferred across all countries. Country differences in patient preference for convenience versus clinical attributes were found. Overall, patients were willing to pay £29.24 ($US46.27) per month for symptom control and mucosal healing, and an additional £78.81 ($US124.70) per month for reduction in flare risk to 10% per year (WTP costs were equalized between each country using the published 2008 purchasing power parity). Those with flares in the past year significantly preferred avoiding future flares (p < 0.0001) versus other attributes, as well as lower risk of flares (10%, likelihood ratio: 0.64-0.70). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that self-reported adherers to UC therapy have a stronger preference for clinical benefits over other treatment attributes, suggesting that positive patient assessment of effectiveness may influence adherence. Ongoing clinician assessment of patient preferences for treatment attributes, as well as education on the importance of adherence, may help improve treatment outcomes in UC.

Preferences for antimuscarinic therapy for overactive bladder.

OBJECTIVE • To examine patient preferences and strength of preferences for treatment for the various symptoms of overactive bladder and adverse events associated with the use of antimuscarinic treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS • A discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey was developed that detailed treatment choices in terms of attributes relating to their efficacy in reducing symptoms and the likelihood of experiencing typical adverse events. Levels for each attribute were based on a literature review, qualitative interviews and a meta-analysis of clinical trial data. • Attributes were combined into choice sets using a fractional orthogonal design that had been folded over. Pairs of choice sets were presented to overactive bladder (OAB) patients (n= 332), who indicated which treatment alternative they preferred. Data were analysed using the conditional logit model. RESULTS • Participants expressed the strongest preference for the avoidance of urgency incontinence episodes, followed by preference for a reduction in the experience of urinary urgency and the number of micturition episodes. The influence of the likelihood of experiencing an adverse event on treatment preference was also estimated. • Finally, marginal rates of substitution were calculated to demonstrate the relative value of trade-offs between the various attributes. • Treatment preferences were found to be broadly similar across two patient age groups (i.e. under 45 s and 45 and over). CONCLUSION • The study demonstrates that individuals with OAB place significant emphasis on the prospect of reduction in symptoms. Avoidance of incontinence episodes is particularly valued and equivalent to a much greater reduction in the frequency of micturition or experience of urgency. However, even a modest increase in the likelihood of experiencing an adverse event could easily motivate a change in treatment preference.

A valuation of infusion therapy to preserve islet function in type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES: Recent advances in monoclonal antibody therapies offer the prospect of the prevention or amelioration of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The present study was designed to capture UK (English and Scottish) preference weights for the process of undergoing infusion therapy and the likely outcomes of treatment for children (8-12 years), adolescents (13-17 years), and adults. METHODS: Vignette descriptions of T1DM health states (describing infusion therapy and reduced insulin need) were constructed based on qualitative interviews with people with type 1 diabetes, clinicians and findings from a literature review. Utilities were elicited for each health state using the standard gamble interview from the general public, adults with diabetes, and parents of children with diabetes. Participants also completed other outcome measures-EQ-5D, Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory, and Hyperglycemic Fear Survey. Mixed model analyses were used to estimate the influence on utility of different participant characteristics. RESULTS: Self-report questionnaires indicated the nature and degree of impact of T1DM on adults', adolescents', and children's quality of life, with adolescents reporting the lowest health-related quality-of-life profile of all groups. The mixed model analysis indicated that each health state was a significant predictor of utility and the T1DM participants gave significantly higher utilities compared with the general public (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The general public and people with diabetes (or parents of children with diabetes) all place significant value on reducing the need for insulin injections; also, all recognize the disutility of undergoing infusion cycles. These values are suitable for supporting estimates of cost-effectiveness of infusion therapies in T1DM.

Elicitation of health state utilities in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to obtain United Kingdom societal preferences for receiving newly developed treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Health states were developed based on a literature review and in-depth interviews with clinical experts. These states described the burden of both stable and progressive disease, and a variety of commonly encountered toxicities associated with first-line therapies (fatigue, diarrhoea, nausea/vomiting, mucositis, hand/foot syndrome, hypertension and anaemia). These states were further reviewed by additional clinicians and patients to ensure their validity. One hundred members of the general public rated the states using the time trade-off (TTO) methodology to determine health state utility. RESULTS: Stable disease had a utility value of 0.795 whilst progressive disease demonstrated a significant decline with a value of 0.355. The range of toxicities showed a variable impact in line with their toxicity grading from fatigue grade I/II (0.751) to hand/foot syndrome grade III (0.469). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the burden associated with a number of common toxicities encountered with current first-line mRCC treatments. Practical constraints coupled with the societal nature of the valuation exercise limited the amount of direct involvement by patients. However, these utility values should better permit the consideration of toxicity profiles in establishing the cost-effectiveness of future treatments.